Liz Truss draws fire after blaming ‘economic establishment’ for her downfall

Liz Truss has attracted widespread attention after claiming she was forced out of office by the “powerful economic establishment” who refused to prioritize growth.

The former prime minister, who has only been in office for 49 days and has made Britain’s financial crisis the focus of the pensions industry, defended the idea in a 4,000-word essay in The Sunday Telegraph..

He said that while he was not “blameless” during his own collapse, he was “not given a real opportunity to implement my policies with a very strong economic establishment, coupled with a lack of political support”.

Truss targeted various opponents for his economic agenda including the Whitehall “blob”, the IMF, US president Joe Biden and even members of the Conservative party.

“I assumed when I entered Downing Street that my mandate would be respected and accepted. How wrong I was,” he wrote.

His argument that the biggest unfunded tax cut in 50 years is the right policy to boost the UK economy was rejected on Sunday by party members and participants in the financial markets, who said he ignored the public finances of the lenders. to the UK. That raises the cost of government debt and sends the element of responsible investment-led pension sector into a tailspin.

Business secretary Grant Shapps on Sunday said the government must “get the basics right” in the economy before cutting taxes.

“I notice they are not preparing the ground for this big tax change,” he told Sky News Sophy Ridge on Sunday program. “What you have to do is solve the big structural problems first, solve the inflation first, solve the debt, and then you look at the tax cuts.”

Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Gordon, said that after reading Truss’s essay, he was “surprised by how little he knows about the role of the UK’s main economic institutions, namely the Office for Budget Responsibility, the Bank of England and the Treasury”.

He said that investors appreciate the role of the institution in increasing the credibility of the economy and, “you cannot manage the medium-sized G7 economy – which investors should no longer be exposed to. [funds] for – without credibility”.

Rupert Harrison, portfolio manager at BlackRock and former adviser to George Osborne when he was chancellor, made fun of Truss interference in the forecast and assessment of the policy by the OBR.

He said that he said something like, “I believe that two plus two equals five, but the same old orthodoxy keeps coming up with the same old answer.”

Although Truss’s premiership was seen as a disaster, his analysis of Britain’s economic woes resonated with right-wing Tory MPs and posed a threat to Rishi Sunak.

The prime minister has been weakened by scandals affecting cabinet ministers and faces tough decisions on the Northern Ireland protocol and small boats legislation. Truss has opened a new front by repeating the economic debate.

Tory MPs generally say Truss has failed to deliver on his economic plan, but many believe aggressive tax cuts are the best way to stimulate growth.

Simon Clarke, a former cabinet minister under Truss, and colleagues set up a new Conservative Growth Group to promote the case for tax cuts and deregulation, a view supported by dozens of Tory MPs.

Former Conservative party leader Sir Jake Berry said he agreed with Truss’s “diagnosis of the ills facing the country”.

“I think he accepted in this story that the recipe we wrote – (for) I have to take part of the blame – was not sent in the right way,” he told the BBC One Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. “But I think we need to cut taxes, we need to create a growing economy, that’s what people want.”

Source link

Leave a Reply