[ad_1]
The Tories have always wanted to present tax cuts as important for business confidence and investment, growth and making the country a place to work and live. They don’t want to focus too much on other factors that influence their business and personal decisions. Let’s take two: good governance and certainty about the laws that affect you. Well, I’m afraid it’s time to revisit the Detained EU Legislation (Repeal and Reform) Bill and the Bill of Rights. (Yes, it’s clunky. Address the complaint to Raab, the Bill’s sponsor. We can add Crimes against the English language and history to the charge sheet he faces.)
The Retained EU Bill is a Rees-Mogg amendment, based on the belief that if the UK rejects all EU legislation it will return to the Garden of Eden, England park you know, before the fall and accretion of oppressive, unnecessary EU rules. Like everything Rees-Mogg says, it’s bullshit. Bill proposes to get rid of all EU laws by the end of this year, other than the Minister who wants to stay or change. Any law not reviewed or repealed by the end of 2023 will automatically come off the statute books. The difficult (unspecified) law can be extended until 2026.
This may be possible if we come across some legislation. But we don’t. There are approx. 4,000 laws in every aspect of life to consider: employment, environment, food and product safety, consumer rights, financial services, VAT, data protection, cyber security, intellectual property, insolvency, business transfer, etc. These are the many laws that underpin every aspect of our daily and commercial lives. Businesses have made investment decisions, structured themselves, trained staff, developed products based on this. Then there is all the case law that arises and depends on the general laws and principles of EU law (which will no longer apply), along with all the additional regulations. (In the 223 business days for New Year’s Eve there are at least 18 laws to consider every day in each government department. Above all the other work of the executive. And events. This will be the most authoritative tax as well as open administration imaginable. It will solve the government and administration which exists now.)
Now all this must be thrown away. how? by whom? Determining which of these laws should remain or partially, which should be eliminated and which should be changed is a monumental task that requires careful consideration of the law, the consequences of the change and the implications for other laws. It takes time, careful thought and, you guessed it, consultation with those affected.
After all, it’s all about Taking Back Control, right? Think again. Perhaps the worst aspect of this bill is how it gives the executive – not Parliament – the power to decide whether any of the laws will be replaced, by what, make new replacement laws and replace, through secondary legislation, other laws ( at above 4,000 laws that have been mentioned) that affect the executive power that has been seized using this bill. As a result, the normal process of parliamentarians considering, debating and voting on new laws or changes to existing ones had to be completely bypassed. The Regulatory Policy Committee gave the bill “red flag”, pointing out that the Department of Business has not completed any precise risk assessment of the Bill’s impact. Former Chief Justice, Judge Igor, gave his brief death speech in the House of Lords debate this week which struck down the Bill.
This is a reckless, infantile and dangerous approach to legislation. This does not take back control. This is an authoritarian and undemocratic power grab. Executives give themselves “do whatever you want“power. Because there will be little time for research and consultation, the chances are – a race certainty, really – that this will lead to bad, confusing legislation, unintended consequences and uncertainty, cost and chaos for everyone. Only lawyers will benefit. There is no point in giving a tax deduction if the money then has to be spent on legal advice to find out what is going on.
Then we have the Bill of Rights, Raab’s attempt to rewrite the Human Rights Act. This has been shown to be a necessary reform. In fact, as mentioned in the Human Rights Committee of the Parliament together report, is another power grab by the Executive, deliberately undermining the ability of individuals and businesses to hold back the government. It is worth reading the Committee’s analysis. Polite as it is, it is a withering breakdown of Bill and Raab’s justification.
The rule of law, certainty about what the law is, stability, trust in order, evidence-based governance systems, oversight, meaningful consultation, the ability to exercise authority and enforce rights are essential basic structures for a viable state. invest in.
Why would businesses invest in the UK with such uncertainty? With such a government? With the government – a Conservative (allegedly) government – to aim to destroy everything that makes the UK a trusted safe country? With a government that doesn’t know what they want, what else do they plan to do?
The EU Bill will now be the responsibility of the new Department of Business and Trade headed by Kemi Badenoch. He has a chance to show that he wants to be a serious politician, who understands the needs of business, what a growing economy needs (and what can start the process of restoring the reputation of the Tory party). Or will he remain in the party’s Brexit safe haven – Rees-Mogg is dressed. As for Raab, it’s time for him and the wretched Bill to move on.
The Romanian writer, Panait Istrati, who spoke about Communism in the 1930s: “Okay, I see a broken egg. Where is your omelette?“It is amazing to find that some 90 years later it accurately reflects the destructive approach of the Tory government.
Cycle free
[ad_2]
Source link