On Thursday, the Biden administration released a $6.9 trillion budget proposal for next year that would reduce the deficit by nearly $3 trillion over the next ten years through tax increases.
In the budget, the government stated that closing “a tax loophole that heavily benefits the wealthy and the largest, most profitable corporations,” would save billions of dollars. With that, President Joe Biden proposed to close the “exchange gap as it were”, as the administration called it, on the grounds that it “allows real estate investors to defer taxes indefinitely.” But this isn’t the first time Biden has proposed capping “as-is” benefits, and it’s unlikely to be included after Congress approves spending levels.
An “as-is exchange,” or 1031 exchange, allows real estate investors to sell their property and get another and defer capital gains taxes on that initial sale. Referring to it as a special tax subsidy, the White House wrote: “This loophole allows real estate investors to avoid paying taxes on profits from real estate transactions indefinitely as long as they remain invested in real estate. This is an unlimited interest-free loan from the government. Real estate is the only asset that gets this sweetheart deal.
University of Southern California public policy professor and director of the Homelessness Policy Research Institute, Gary Painter, told fortune Of course Biden is trying to point out that “people who own rental properties as an investment should not be treated differently than people who own houses,” as an understanding of tax fairness.
If the rules about how easy it is to move from one investment property to another change, you might just see fewer of those exchanges because investors don’t want to pay multiple times their capital, Painter said. Not to mention that changing the law could make it more difficult to get financing because real profits are reduced, which changes the value of properties like multifamily buildings. Painter went on to add that closing the 1031 exchange “isn’t the right thing to do right now,” and that there are other opportunities for the government to close loopholes that don’t have an impact on multifamily housing.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, on Thursday after the release of the budget, tweeted: “Real estate investors, including giant corporate landlords, bought 1/4 of all single-family homes sold in 2021, often exploiting tax breaks. As I understand it, taxpayers’ money for housing must solve the affordability crisis – not add to Wall Street,” seemed to endorse Biden’s proposal.
The Biden administration said that to eliminate this tax subsidy for real estate, it would save $19 billion. Whether the money will go to However, is not mentioned. However, in a separate entity from the budget, the administration proposes to invest more than $ 175 billion in housing-with a plan to invest in building and preserving millions of affordable homes, while reducing barriers to housing production; work on housing accessibility and affordability for youth aging out of foster care and veterans; invest in first-time, first generation homebuyers by providing money down; and funding to build unprecedented eviction prevention, diversion, and rental programs under the Biden Administration and efforts to end homelessness.
Painter said he had to predict, it would not “live” in the Republican-led House, which is reportedly considering cutting the housing program with its own budget that is expected this spring, according to New York Times.
About thirty minutes after Biden and his administration unveiled their proposed budget for next year, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted“President Biden just sent a budget to Congress, and it’s not serious. He’s proposing trillions of new taxes that you and your family will pay directly or through higher fees. Mr. President: Washington has a spending problem, not a revenue problem,” which got a retweet from the House GOP account.
At multiple’ report, published before the release of Biden’s budget, the publication stated that some House Republicans developed their own budgets that depended heavily on the budget line created by Russell Vought (former budget director of the Trump administration.)
The budget line includes a 43% cut to housing programs, which includes eliminating Section 8, among the proposed cuts, according to multiple. Vought told the multiple that the strategy uses spending cuts against “a government that is awake and armed.” But cutting the housing program by less than half, and eliminating Section 8 (which uses housing vouchers to help low-income people with monthly rent), “would be devastating,” Painter said, adding that homelessness and housing insecurity would be devastating. . up dramatically.
“I have a feeling that in both cases, it’s just a matter of knowing that both sides won’t pass,” Painter said fortune, but it is a way of signaling commitment to constituents. In Biden’s case, he showed that real estate investors should be treated the same as people who own their own homes, signaling a commitment to fairness, Painter said. Republicans, if the proposal includes cuts to the housing program, keep their promise to cut “all kinds of social safety net programs.”
fortuneThe CFO Daily newsletter is a must-read analysis for every finance professional who needs to get ahead. Sign up today.