[ad_1]

- What happened to the separation of church and state?
- What happened to the individual liberties guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?
- How can the Supreme Court ignore 50 years of legal precedent?
- What about men who, with their partners, do not want the pregnancy to progress?
- What about women who die from ectopic pregnancies?
- Why is protecting the right to carry deadly guns more important than the right to control health choices and reproductive rights?
- Do you see the hypocrisy in grief for the unformed, unborn, and yet to protect the rights of any wacko, hateful person to have an assault rifle that is responsible for being the #1 cause of death of children in America?
- What about government-forced vasectomy reversals if a man’s partner wants the kind of sex he needs to have a child?
NOT FORCING VASECTOMY IN CHILDHOOD? DOES IT FEEL ILLEGAL? THIS LAW CAN BE IDENTICAL TO THE PROHIBITION OF ABORTION AND FORCED PREGNANCY BECAUSE IT ENHANCES THE RIGHTS OF MEN TO REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM AND AUTONOMY IN THEIR BODY. IF THE GOVERNMENT WANTS WOMEN TO KNOW WHAT CONTRACEPTIONS THEY CAN OR CAN’T USE, WHY CAN’T THE GOVERNMENT CONTROL WHEN MEN CAN OR CAN’T GET WOMEN PREGNANT? WHY DOESN’T THE GOVERNMENT DECIDE when or if men can reverse a vasectomy?
In 1729, writer Jonathan Swift wrote a satirical essay called, “A Modest Proposal” which suggested that poor Irish people should sell their children for food. He emphasized that this proposal will burden poor Irish families from worrying about how they will be able to take care of their children and solve the problem of overpopulation in Ireland. The purpose was to expose the greed and apathy of the rich at that time.
Will the VASECTOMY Proposition wake up evangelicals, old white Christians, and opportunistic republican congressmen to see the cruelty and dangers of abortion bans? Will they understand the sarcasm that recalls SWIFT’S ESSAY and stop the attack on women’s lives, health, and freedom?


Published by
[ad_2]
Source link