Conor Benn to return to WBC rankings as ‘highly-elevated consumption of eggs’ explanation for failed drugs test | Boxing News

[ad_1]

Conor Benn is set to return to the WBC ranks after deeming “extremely high egg consumption” a “reasonable explanation” for his failed drug test last year.

Benn tested positive for banned substances ahead of the match with Chris Eubank Jr., which is scheduled to take place in October last year at catchweight.

After the adverse findings were discovered in the British Boxing Board of Control banned Benn’s fight with Eubank from taking place and the promoter finally canceled it.

Conor Ben
Picture:
Conor Benn has maintained his innocence

The WBC removed Benn from the world rankings after he failed a VADA (Voluntary Anti-Doping Association) test.

But on Wednesday, after Benn appealed, he returned.

Benn remains under investigation by UKAD and the British Boxing Board of Control and while that is ongoing, he will not be licensed to box in the UK.

But maybe they can find other countries and alternative jurisdictions to enter.

A WBC statement read: “Conor Benn completed the enrollment process in the WBC Clean Boxing Program in February 2022. Enrollment in the WBC CBP is mandatory for all fighters rated above 15 in the WBC Ratings. Therefore, he is enrolled in the WBC CBP anti-doping testing which is not there is a competition in July 2022, when the collection of samples announced in the WBC Decision is here.

“On August 23, 2022, the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (“VADA”) informed Mr. Benn and the World Boxing Council (“WBC”) that the urine “Sample” collected from him on July 25, 2022, was related to his participation in the testing program anti-doping WBC / VADA produced adverse analytical findings for Clomiphene and hydroxymetabolites MI and M2.

“Clomiphene and its metabolites are prohibited at all times in WBC CBP. Clomiphene is a metabolic modulator that increases testosterone production and increases testosterone levels while burning fat.

“On August 30, 2022, the WBC notified Mr. Benn of the Adverse Finding and requested the information and materials necessary to investigate the situation. The WBC did not receive a substantial response until December 2022.

“Mr. Benn denies at any time the intentional or accidental ingestion of any prohibited chemical. The defense against the Adverse Finding centered on the allegations of potential failure of laboratory analysis and irregularities in connection with the analysis of the samples and the results of the samples ‘ WBC asked several experts in the laboratory analysis anti-doping, including expert consultants with more than 30 years of experience in WADA and IOC accredited laboratory settings. Furthermore, the WBC reaffirms the unquestionable integrity of VADA and the sample collection agencies and laboratories that use VADA’s services in relation to WBC CBP.

“Not until early January 2023, the WBC Results Management Unit can conduct a full and substantive analysis of Mr. Benn’s arguments and defenses. On January 26, 2023, members of the WBC Results Management Unit held a questioning session with Mr. Benn and members of his legal team. In early February 2023 , Mr. Benn’s team for the first time provided detailed information about Mr. Benn’s diet and supplement consumption that may have directly affected his Adverse Finding.

“The WBC benefited from the services of an expert nutritionist. The WBC expert provided information on the characteristics of the substances issued in this case and examples of similar adverse findings in several sports, according to various anti-doping programs.

“The decision of the WBC Board of Governors is based on: (1) the facts known to the WBC at the time of the decision; (2) the circumstances that can be applied to a specific case; (3) the decision of the WBC in anti-precedential. -cases of doping violations; (4) analysis and recommendations that is unbiased, general and fair from the WBC Results Management Unit; and (5) reliable and trustworthy health-related and scientific literature.

“The WBC found that: (1) there was no conclusive evidence that Mr. Benn participated in the ingestion of Clomiphene knowingly or knowingly; (2) there was no failure in procedures related to sample collection, sample analysis, or violation of Mr. Benn’s Right to Sample B which will correct the question or invalidating Adverse Finding, and (3) Mr.

“The WBC Nutrition Committee will work with Mr. Benn’s team to design a nutrition program aimed at avoiding the risk of future adverse findings caused by nutritional factors. The nutrition program ordered by the WBC.

“WBC will include Mr. Benn in the ratings during the period immediately after the issuance of the decision.

“The WBC will establish a line of communication with WADA regarding the WBC’s concerns about Clomiphene as a food contaminant and the potential for false positives caused by the consumption of contaminated food.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply